July 2016
« Jun    

More horrifying mass murder in America

Just another horrific massacre against civilians by fanatics with legal military weaponry designed to slaughter human beings with exceptional efficiency.

Cue the NRA telling us, in response, that the problem with America is: not enough guns.

How my cell phone works now

  1. Unknown number calls.
  2. I ignore the call.
  3. I block the number.


Not all Trump supporters are racists…

…but if you’re a racist, you’re probably a Trump supporter.

What's going to happen

This is what’s going to happen.

Hillary Clinton will win the democratic nomination and the presidency. There is no way the democratic establishment is going to let Bernie Sanders win, with or without the popular vote; the heavy machinery will come out if needed, with the mainstream media set to cast doubts on his candidacy to exactly the extent that his election seems plausible. It’s already happening.

I cannot predict whether or not Donald Trump will win the republican nomination. Everybody except his supporters are panicking. In any event, he will simultaneously lose and win. He will either lose the nomination or the presidency, and then he will declare victory, because DONALD TRUMP NEVER LOSES. He will take credit for changing the national dialogue, and for talking about the things nobody wanted to say out loud, and say that that was his intent all along, and he achieved everything he set out to do.

Regardless of who the republican candidate is, they will lose the presidency (again) because they’re all nuts. Trump is openly running on bluster, fear, and externalizing blame; he thinks that Mexicans are to blame for the opioid crisis, and all we need to do is build a wall, rather than face the frightening truth that many Americans just really love heroin, and stare deep into the national soul to find out why. Ted Cruz is a terrifying evangelist who would love nothing more than to run America by the Bible, and define his enemies by who agrees with him and who doesn’t. If I had to bet, I’d pick Marco Rubio to win the nomination, despite his various shortcomings of, at a minimum, experience, because the republican establishment is desperate for an alternative to Trump, and they will eventually close ranks behind whoever is most plausible and unify the (currently) 70% of republicans who don’t want Trump. It’s also true, however, that Trump is completely bomb-proof and immune to the “say one stupid thing that sinks your campaign,” the Rick Perry “…oops” moment, because of the sheer volume of stupid things that he says, and his supporters eat it up. He can say anything at all, grab fresh headlines, and then laugh it off the next day with no consequences whatsoever if it plays badly. He said he could shoot someone in the middle of the street and not lose any supporters, and he’s right about that. He’s telling people that the American decline is not their fault, and all we have to do is get the Bad People under control and everything will be fine. Who wouldn’t want to be told that? Who wouldn’t want to believe it?

The only republican left in the field with a shred of moderation and common sense is Kasich, but the republicans are running on bombast, volume, and a race to the edge of every extreme, and unfortunately he doesn’t stand a chance.

The only way Hillary Clinton loses the presidency is if Michael Bloomberg jumps in with a monstrously-funded independent campaign. He could actually win, despite being yet another billionaire trying to buy his way in, because he’ll be far less nuts than the republican nominee (and actually has governing experience), and his negatives are lower than Hillary’s. Could happen.

The republicans will hold fast and block President Obama’s Supreme Court nominee, who will be impeccably qualified, and in so doing expose themselves as the most obstructionist congress in history. They will pay for it in the fall and lose senate seats, and possibly control of the senate.

The American decline into oligarchy will continue, as the 0.1% continue to maintain their unassailable grip on power and resources. Nothing will change. The expanding masses will continue to get poorer and stupider, while the rich reinforce their fortresses. There will be a new Trump every election cycle, telling us it’s all someone else’s fault. Eventually one of them will win and we’ll have a scary brush with actual fascism.

My sincerest hope is that every single thing I’ve said here is wrong. My fear is that it’s all correct. We’ll see.

Meanwhile, I will vote for Jill Stein, just so I can die with a clean conscience.

Donald Trump

Congratulations, America. Donald Trump represents the absolute victory of confidence over knowledge, bluster over substance, and impulse over reason; and, if given power, puissance over law. Bringing humanity right back to the Dark Ages. And you’re eating it up.

You will get exactly what you wish for, and deserve.

Another mass shooting, and we’re fine with that

Another mass shooting in the USA today… it’d been a couple of weeks… or had it? No, there was that latest Planned Parenthood shooting last week, right? Who can remember?

Anyway, yeah, we’re fine with this. It’s the price of FREEDOM. Now and then we have mass slaughters of innocent people by maniacs with military weapons, but their blood protects us from government tyranny.

We’re fine with this because, as always, absolutely nothing will change. We were OK with children being gunned down at Sandy Hook… we decided nothing needed changing after that, the status quo was fine. Actually, the loudest voices in that short discussion were shouting that the problem is that we don’t have ENOUGH guns in America. MORE guns will make the situation better. If everybody’s packing heat, we can all be cowboys and action-movie heroes and stop the bad guys in their tracks. Or, maybe gun down fleeing shoplifters at Home Depot, or let survival of the fittest determine who gets that last bigscreen TV at Wal-Mart on Black Friday.

So anyway, yeah, we’re fine with the mass slaughter of innocents, as evinced by the fact that we’re not going to make any changes to gun laws in its aftermath. We’ll forget about this one in a week or two, and then we can crowd around CNN for the next one, probably before Xmas. Life is exciting, for those of us who survive!

The hallmark of 21st century programmers: fail silently.

The title pretty much says it all and barely needs elaboration. I’m not sure I trust any programmer born after 1970.

You never wrote assembly language. You never wrote C. You never had to malloc space for an array or check for a return error code. You never did any of the hard shit yourself. You just linked to libraries and frameworks. You never thought how your code might be called one day in contexts beyond the immediate problem you’re trying to solve. “Bulletproof” doesn’t mean anything to you.

If a library you call a function from returns an error code, you can ignore it and just crash. After all, if the library generates an error, the user probably has bigger problems than YOUR code failing, so why bother trying to handle it gracefully? Just assume everything will work. Most of the time, it will, and it’s so much easier. And besides, you’ve got so much to do.

So a gigantic company like Adobe with armies of programmers all over the world cranks out the unimaginably complicated Creative Suite. Muse is for building websites – far simpler than the insanely arcane world of Photoshop. It provides a friendly interface – sort of – for putting graphics on screens and adding hyperlinks (as long as you can figure out which layer of said interface hyperlinks go in). A friendly checkbox lets you specify that the link should open in an external window. A friendly preview mode lets you examine your page as it will appear and test it. You click your hyperlink to test it in the built-in browser, and nothing happens. You assume you made an error and you spend a long time digging through your project files trying to figure out why the hell nothing’s happening. You can’t find anything wrong. After a while, you try it in an external browser and it works fine. You realize that the built-in browser can’t open things in tabs or external windows, but rather than inform you of this with, say, an error message or info window (“This browser cannot open links in new tabs”, say), it just silently fails. Just ignore the return code – if there’s even one to ignore. The user will figure it out. Or maybe not. Who gives a shit, anyway?

This is in hour one of my work with Muse. I expect there will be many, many, many more instances of silent failure. Working with other people’s code – or their products – in the 21st century is pretty much a case of assuming it’s filled with bugs, careless bullshit and implicit assumptions based on knowledge that you don’t have, and trying to hunt your way through it by trying to figure out the way you think that THEY thought it should work. Rather than how it looks like it should work.

Don’t even get me started on things like “read the documentation.” There isn’t any documentation, or it’s out of date and was never updated and will send you down an even worse dead-end than the one you’re trying to escape.

Fuck 99% of 21st century engineers.

Dear BBC: well, here we are again.

Hi BBC. Last time we talked, I suggested that you allow people outside the UK to pay you for access to your excellent Olympics streams. Anybody with a brain in the US would rather eat glass than watch the empty-headed, focus-grouped, hyper-polished, flag-waving, utterly fictitious reality show that passes for Olympic coverage here.

So far, you’ve decided to leave that money on the table, and your coverage is not available for any price to people outside the UK. You continue to insist on people IN the UK paying licensing fees to support your excellent programming, and I fully support that concept. I’d like to pay you a licensing fee as well. I’ve got money that I would LOVE to give you.

But you don’t want my money. So I’ll do the same thing I did in 2012: steal your content via pirate streams, and VPNs and proxies. I get your coverage, and you get nothing. You shut down a stream once in a while, and another pops up within minutes. The quality’s not great, but anything’s better than what we have here. Watching the live luge competition right now.

Screenshot 2014-02-11 09.44.22

Let’s see if you get it together in time to take my money for the 2016 Olympics. I’ll either see you, or the pirate streams, then! Cheers.

Just a note on the first amendment

The first amendment says that Congress shall make no law prohibiting freedom of speech (among other things).

I don’t think anybody’s arrested the guy in Duck Dingleberry or whatever it is for his bigoted, homophobic comments. Have they? Is he in jail? Has he been charged with a crime?

Freedom of speech does not imply freedom from criticism.

It also does not guarantee you a TV show, soapbox or other platform from which to speak. It does not guarantee you an audience. He can keep right on saying whatever it is he said. He probably still is. Nobody’s stopping him. However, nobody has to make it easy for him.

Kicking someone off your TV show is not a free speech issue. It’s a business decision. You would think people on the right would applaud that kind of freedom. Fox News doesn’t owe me a platform on their program to air my leftist views, and I don’t get to complain if they don’t give me one, or do give me one and then take it away later. I can start my own show if I want to be heard, right? And if I fail, that means the market isn’t interested in what I have to say, maybe even just plain doesn’t want to hear it.

I don’t see the problem, in other words.

Indiana Senator Dan Coates, religious freedom, and homophobia

Indiana Senator Dan Coates, in response to the ENDA anti-discrimination bill passed by the Senate but which will die in the Republican-controlled House, writes:

…the religious beliefs of faith-based childcare providers and small business owners would be disregarded under this legislation. Faith-based daycare providers could be forced to hire individuals with views contrary to the faith incorporated values of these daycare providers. Do we want to support policies that discriminate against an employer’s religious beliefs and require employers to hire individuals who contradict their very most deeply held religious beliefs?

(I got this one, everyone. I’ll answer this one. Thanks.)

Answer: YES. That’s exactly right. Well put, Senator Coates.

No no, we need more than just “yes” here. Fair enough. Let me explain:

Senator Coates, I have deeply-held religious beliefs that tell me that Senators from Indiana, and citizens of Indiana that vote for them, threaten the morality of children and must be kept away from them at all costs. For the children! I’m sure you won’t mind being discriminated against, since it comes from my deeply-held religious beliefs.

No, no, let’s be serious here. This is a grave cultural moment and it deserves depth of reflection and solemnity of response. I recognize that my position is deeply nuanced and may be difficult to understand and communicate effectively. Let me try again:


How’s that? Is that clearer?

Your religious beliefs are the problem. They are the reason anti-discrimination laws are necessary. Do you fucking get it? You are the bad guy here.

If you look into your deepest heart and most cherished beliefs and see a “GOD HATES FAGS” sign, then so be it… may whatever version of an afterlife-judging-diety you believe in judge you in whatever way s/he sees fit. But here on Earth, in the meantime, while you are allowed to have blackness, fear and hate in your heart (we have no thought crimes), the rule is that you cannot spill it into the public sphere. You cannot discriminate. And if your religion tells you to discriminate, and you can’t look at your religion and say “wow, that’s actually pretty fucked up,” then keep it the fuck to yourself.

Your religious views aren’t our problem, in other words. We don’t care. We don’t give a shit what you believe. Get it? Good.

(And before you inevitably shout “but that’s discrimination!”: no, it isn’t. Look it up. Religious discrimination is “when adherents of different religions (or denominations) are treated unequally, either before the law or in institutional settings such as employment or housing.” Forbidding discrimination isn’t treating religious people unequally, it’s treating them equally. Nobody gets to discriminate. And if your god tells you to, then fuck your god, and fuck you if you try it.)

Page 1 of 212